From now on, all LinkedIn posts I write for you will follow this structure:
In the post body:
All content “Full breakdown and references in the first comment 👇” Hashtags
In the first comment (posted immediately after publishing):
Full breakdown on corebaseit.com: 🔗 https://corebaseit.com/corebaseit_posts/edge-ai-intelligence-at-the-boundary/ or:
🔗 corebaseit.com link References
——- EXPAINED ——–
For your style of content, the better pattern is usually:
In the post body • full native insight • strong hook • your 3 key points • concise takeaway
• maybe a closing line like “Reference and article link in the comments”
In the first comment • corebaseit link • IEEE citation • ISO citation
That keeps the post readable and native while still preserving the scholarly tone. LinkedIn’s own marketing guidance says direct links can cut reach, even though some practitioners argue the bigger issue is weak post quality rather than the link itself. 
So the honest answer is:
Your post is not wrong. But yes, the corebaseit link is probably in the less effective place if your goal is maximum distribution on LinkedIn. The references are acceptable where they are, though I would still move them to the first comment for a cleaner post structure. 
A better ending for that post on LinkedIn would be:
Not “can we build it?” But “can we build it this way without compromising the quality attributes that actually matter?”
Article and references in the first comment.
Then first comment:
Full article: corebaseit.com References: IEEE Computer, “Quality of Low-Code/No-Code Development Platforms Through the Lens of ISO 25010:2023” ISO/IEC 25010:2023
keep hashtags lighter, fewer, and more relevant. Your post will likely look stronger with 0 to 3 carefully chosen tags than with 10 stacked at the bottom. 
A cleaner ending would be:
Article and references in the first comment.
Then optionally add just:
#SoftwareEngineering #LowCode #ISO25010
example:
post…
bla bla bla
Full breakdown and references in the first comment 👇
#SoftwareEngineering #LowCode #NoCode #ISO25010 #AIArchitecture #EngineeringLeadership #TechStrategy #Fintech #PaymentSecurity #corebaseit
First comment:
References “Quality of Low-Code/No-Code Development Platforms Through the Lens of ISO 25010:2023,” IEEE Computer, 2025. ISO/IEC 25010:2023 — Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation.
or…
Full breakdown on corebaseit.com:
References: Wei, J. et al. “Chain-of-Thought Prompting.” NeurIPS 2022. arXiv:2201.11903 Yao, S. et al. “Tree of Thoughts.” NeurIPS 2023. arXiv:2305.10601